http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/ Digital marketing consultancy in Wellington, New Zealand. Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:17:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1329 Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:20:36 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1329 Hey Nicci, nice to hear from you. There’s little doubt that Jackson has a massive sway for the “entertainment” industry but I’d say he’s a bit of a stretch for web influence.

]]> http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1325 Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:36:56 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1325 Peter Jackson? Depending on how you define net/web/technology … ?

]]> http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1223 Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:00:59 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1223 And until recently, Lance Atkinson, the spam-artist in Christchurch (Kiwi spam network was ‘world’s biggest’ – http://www.stuff.co.nz/4729188a28.html)

]]> http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1222 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:46:04 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1222 As a blogger on O’Reilly Radar, public speaker, convener of Kiwi Foo, Nat has a tremendous (positive) influence on all aspects of the Internet in NZ. From Webstock to Section 92a, gnat is right there in the thick of it…

]]> http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1221 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:40:22 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1221 Why J?

]]> http://adprotocol.co.nz/the-listener-can%e2%80%99t-hear-us/#comment-1220 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:36:37 +0000 http://www.adprotocol.co.nz/?p=42#comment-1220 Nat Torkington?

]]>